Design Diplomacy: Architecture's Relationship with Public Policy - DesignIntelligence
[FREE] Architecture And The Special Relationship The American Influence On. Post War British Architecture [EPUB] [PDF]. Book file PDF easily. Architecture and the 'special relationship': the American influence on post-war With particular reference to the field of architecture, this text examines the. Free Online Library: Architecture and the 'special relationship': the American influence on post-war British architecture.(Book review) by "The Architectural.
When first erected the sculpture was deemed inappropriate for the citizens of Bologna and instructions were sent from the Cardinals in Rome that the Papacy declared the figure should be robed. The powerful figure remains very nude today and stands proudly over the people gathering below. The benefit of having your uncle as the Pope I suppose.
- Account Options
- Architecture and Sculpture: The Importance of the ‘Special Relationship’
- 1st Edition
An incredible piece of monumental male figurative sculpture and is overwhelming in every sense. Today the materials and patina of the bronze have aged but the figure of male virility and power remains youthful.
This serves only as a device to reinforce his identity as Neptune. Not that the crowds looking up at him from below need any convincing of what they are actually looking at; a portrayal of a sexual, virile muscular male form. This is Bologna versus the sculptural powerhouses of Florence and Rome. Here, under the guise of antiquity, myth and historical story telling, we have the most incredibly sexualised portrayal of the female body depicted on the base of the Fontana di Nettuno fountain.
The Three Chimneys : Work : Studio : Culture + Narrative
The fetishisation of the female under the guise of a water nymph is spectacular. The only place today you would see such an obvious sexual voyeuristic approach to the female body would be in the pornography industry. Gone are the Ancient Roman nymphs, elegantly holding overflowing urns and pitchers. The interplay of public policy and architecture needs to be examined in order to gain a better understanding of the dynamics of a successful society.
The inherent connection between design and public policy is rarely discussed, if at all. I have been very privileged to wear many hats during my career as an architect and public servant.
My architectural training has served me well throughout my working life. The practice of architecture continues to enhance and inform my career, where I have served the public as Congressman from New Hampshire and now as I serve my nation as Ambassador to Denmark. As a matter of fact, architecture played a role in my public service career right from the start.
By virtue of our training, skills and perspective, architects should play that role, but, sadly, we rarely do. From this morass of conflict, architects are expected to create sound structures of lasting value; works of art, if you will. These forms we create are more than art, however. They must function as protective machines providing order and place while they elevate the human condition, both spiritually and literally. And, as you all know, this is easier, much easier, said than done.
But that IS what we architects are committed to do-it is the central mission of our profession. We must be prepared to do more.
It is time to change our perspective. The creative process of architects is a constructive, inclusive process—therefore more diplomatic than the aggressive and adversarial methods of engagement in politics. Public Policy and the Practice of Architecture.
So it seems logical to start off with a new definition and an outline of a few key topics and terms: Accountability and Responsibility to the Local Community 6. But it fails to capture an inevitable but very unpredictable development of our global community: Examples can be found all around us. This is the final piece of the transportation network that connects all of Europe. Now it is possible to truck goods and raw materials across all of Europe, all the way to the remotest parts of Northern and Eastern Europe and the vast terrain of the former Soviet Union.
This bridge physically links the developed world with remote societies largely detached from the technology and prosperity we so often take for granted. As old paradigms are shifting, being redefined or being demolished altogether, how do we as a profession adapt?
How do we remain in command of our established role while modern society is morphing around us? The traditional chain of command, where information is passed down in smaller and smaller increments, has been turned on its head.
Now huge amounts of data are collected and transferred to the small group of decision-makers at the top. Already now, and more so in the near future, vast numbers of individuals will have access to information on choices in life no longer limited by their immediate, physical surroundings. These are opportunities created by this new surge of information. They will no longer have to travel in order to work, to shop or to educate themselves. Where does the architect figure in this? Issues of sustainability and the creation of livable communities through social design were addressed.
Let me quote a passage from Understanding Media: The artist is any man in any field, scientific or humanistic, who grasps the implications of his actions and of the new knowledge in his own time. He is the man of integral awareness. The artist can correct the sense ratios before the blow of new technology has numbed conscious procedures. He can correct them before numbness and subliminal groping and reaction sets in.
If this is true, how is it possible to present the matter to those who are in the position to do something about it? Obviously, before an answer can be formulated, the architectural profession must first take stock.
The issue of knowledge management is broad and critical. How do we manage our knowledge? How do we employ high technology?
How do we apply this ever-increasing body of knowledge to the task at hand? How do we communicate amongst ourselves?
How do we communicate to the public at large, beyond the physical reality of the buildings we construct? How can we match our skills and demonstrate our value to society as effectively as those youngsters, the I. Perhaps the answer lies in our accountability and responsibility to our communities.
Not just to the international community of architects, but to those in our home communities. This is an area unconsidered and under-valued by our profession. But of course, we are not alone in this.